RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept

["Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>]

I want you to review first :-), if it's ok, I will resend base on new tip.

-Xin 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
>Sent: 2006年10月14日 5:46
>To: Li, Xin B; Xen Devel
>Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept
>
>
>No signed-off-by -- are you posting this just for info right now?
>
>The other (PIC) patch is fine. I'll take it for 3.0.3.
>
> -- Keir
>
>
>On 13/10/06 10:44 pm, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>  this patch is to fix INS/OUTS.
>> Thanks
>> -Xin
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Li, Xin B 
>>> Sent: 2006年10月14日 4:43
>>> To: Li, Xin B; Xen Devel
>>> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept
>>> 
>>> Hi Keir, this fix is critical to stability of HVM.
>>> BTW, we are fixing MOVS and INS/OUTS for HVM, hopefully
>>> sending the patch tomorrow, acturally the code is totally
>>> messed up, althought they are nearly never used, but we
>>> believe they do introduce stability issue.
>>> thanks
>>> -Xin 
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
>Of Li, Xin B
>>>> Sent: 2006年10月13日 3:10
>>>> To: Xen Devel
>>>> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept
>>>> 
>>>> an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept.
>>>> In PIC IO, address from send_pio_req is physical address already.
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiaohui Xin <xiaohui.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Yang <xiaowei.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> 
>>> 
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel