[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept


  • To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Xen Devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 06:09:08 +0800
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:09:47 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcbuMfZd+m00pUnBSgOFo1LNeBzEQQA1Z+fQAAI773AAABpAWgAAhoHQAAA5BC8AAAN3gA==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept

No, I think we can put it after 3.0.3 is released :-)
-Xin 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
>Sent: 2006年10月14日 5:54
>To: Li, Xin B; Xen Devel
>Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept
>
>Does it fix a reproducible issue? If not it can wait til after 3.0.3-0.
>
> -- Keir
>
>On 13/10/06 11:01 pm, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I want you to review first :-), if it's ok, I will resend 
>base on new tip.
>> 
>> -Xin 
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>> Sent: 2006年10月14日 5:46
>>> To: Li, Xin B; Xen Devel
>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept
>>> 
>>> 
>>> No signed-off-by -- are you posting this just for info right now?
>>> 
>>> The other (PIC) patch is fine. I'll take it for 3.0.3.
>>> 
>>> -- Keir
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 13/10/06 10:44 pm, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>  this patch is to fix INS/OUTS.
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -Xin
>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Li, Xin B
>>>>> Sent: 2006年10月14日 4:43
>>>>> To: Li, Xin B; Xen Devel
>>>>> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO 
>intercept
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Keir, this fix is critical to stability of HVM.
>>>>> BTW, we are fixing MOVS and INS/OUTS for HVM, hopefully
>>>>> sending the patch tomorrow, acturally the code is totally
>>>>> messed up, althought they are nearly never used, but we
>>>>> believe they do introduce stability issue.
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> -Xin 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
>>> Of Li, Xin B
>>>>>> Sent: 2006年10月13日 3:10
>>>>>> To: Xen Devel
>>>>>> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept.
>>>>>> In PIC IO, address from send_pio_req is physical address already.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiaohui Xin <xiaohui.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Yang <xiaowei.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.