Re: [Xen-devel] Has 3.0.3 been released?

[Aron Griffis <aron@xxxxxx>]

Keir Fraser wrote:  [Tue Oct 17 2006, 05:55:20PM EDT]
> > Will the tree structure change from the current sparse model to
> > a fully-populated kernel?  IMHO it wouldn't be too hard to use
> > something similar to
> > http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/linux-2.6.tip-xen.hg plus a top-level
> > xen directory containing the hypervisor.  Alternatively, since Xen
> > isn't just Linux, maybe the hypervisor and kernels should be in
> > separate repositories?
> 
> Perhaps. We might at least separate the kernel bits from the
> hypervisor bits. We like working with a sparse tree as it's much
> quicker than cloning entire Linux repos.

I suppose xen/include/public synchronization also poses a challenge,
unless it's okay for the kernel to #include files outside of the
kernel tree.

Aron

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel