Re: [Xen-devel][PATCH][RESEND] PV drivers for HVM guests

["Ky Srinivasan" <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at  6:12 AM, in message
<200610201012.k9KACIF29714@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<Doi.Tsunehisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> Hi,
> 
> You (ksrinivasan) said:
>> We intend  to maintain the source for the unmodified drivers separately
>> in our source tree. The idea is that this will track the official xen
>> source tree; we would apply the patch to target this source for a
>> particular unmodified guest target. This would eliminate the need to
>> carry the compatibility baggage in the pristine unmodified driver code.
> 
>   I understand that it has to be separated from xen source tree for
> maintenacne as products. But I think that we should avoid to fork the
> source tree. Because its code structure is not stable, I think.
> 
>   What do you think about ?

We are not forking tree. The pristine PV driver code will always be the exact 
code in the xen source tree. 

Regards,

K. Y
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel