[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] Dom0 Virtual Memory
I'm not sure if this is answering the right or wrong
question, but I think you're missing a bit somewhere.
Xen is managing the MACHINE PHYSICAL memory and the
GUEST is believing that the GUEST PHYSICAL is "real" physical memory. The next
level above, which is the OS's handling of virtual to physical and physical to
virtual will just handle this as if GUEST PHYSICAL really was the true picture
of the world. There are however some places where the difference is "real" -
drivers that use direct memory access (bus mastering) will need to have the
bus-address, and until IOMMU is a reality for most people, the bus-address is
MACHINE PHYSICAL. So there's special code inside the device-drivers to handle
the translation of the GUEST PHYSICAL to MACHNE PHYSICAL when translating the
virtual address given by the user-mode application into a PHYSICAL address.
The tables used to manage virtual to guest-physical is the
page-tables. Obviously, for ease of use, the OS will also implement some sort of
virtual to physical and physical to virtual tables to translate between the two
as necessary.
In HVM (or any other case of "shadow mode"), you can use
shadow_gva_to_[gfn,gpa] to get the guest-physical address, and then
sh_vcp_gfn_to_mfn() to translate that to a machine frame. mfn_x appears to
translate that to a "real address" - although my 2 minutes of grepping didn't
find it...
--
Mats
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |