[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] machine check support in HVM guests

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:29:45 +0000
Delivery-date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 04:28:26 -0800
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Neither SVM nor VMX suppress CPUID[1].EDX.MC{E,A}, but there also is no
virtualization of the respective MSRs. Since the latter seems to have at best
marginal usefulness, shouldn't CPUID be respectively updated?

Thanks, Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] machine check support in HVM guests
  - From: Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] machine check support in HVM guests
  - From: Petersson, Mats

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/04] Kexec / Kdump: Release 20061122 (xen-unstable-12502)
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] netback crash with xen3.0.3
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix the wrong order definition of ES/DS in regs structure of VMXAssist.
Next by thread: RE: [Xen-devel] machine check support in HVM guests
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.