[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] x86 swiotlb questions

To: "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:48:19 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 04:47:05 -0800
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

>Do we merge okay with lib/swiotlb.c then?

Not yet - because of the highmem handling needed for i386. I wonder, however,
how native Linux gets away with not handling this through swiotlb, and why
nevertheless Xen needs to special case this. Any ideas?

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] x86 swiotlb questions
  - From: Keir Fraser

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] x86 swiotlb questions
  - From: Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] x86 swiotlb questions
  - From: Keir Fraser

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] Fix the option "cpus" parsing issue in HVM guest configuration file
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch/rfc] multiprotocol blkback drivers (32-on-64)
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] x86 swiotlb questions
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] x86 swiotlb questions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.