[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] two missing bits (was Re: Add -Wcast-qual flag)
If this was with -Wconst-qual, yes. But didn't we agree that at least for now we'll not add that warning (and hence we also don't absolutely have to change code only affected by it)? Jan >>> Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 22.12.06 10:40 >>> Maybe we need a CONST_ADDR macro, as I suspect the problem is the cast hidden inside the ADDR macro is dropping the const qualifier. -- Keir On 22/12/06 9:31 am, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I object to the change to variable_test_bit() - why is that needed? I had > specifically > submitted a patch to get the const qualifier added there. Jan > >>>> "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> 22.12.06 10:05 >>> > > Hi! > > I catched two pieces with debug and crash_debug enabled. > One of them fixes a build error even without the -Wcast-qual flag. > > Patch attached. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |