[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue

To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx>
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:06:20 +0100
Cc: Xen devel list <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:07:12 -0800
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

I really don't understand why we need this level of generality and
complexity, in particular when a simple hypercall to query a domain's
width would do.  Or a simple, stupid version number in the shared
page.  We'll hardly end up with an unmanageable number of versions.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue
  - From: Gerd Hoffmann

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue
  - From: Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue
  - From: Gerd Hoffmann

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM save restore clean/fix
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.