Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Clean up and fix errors in strncpy -> strlcpy conversion

["Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday 30 January 2007 14:47, Aron Griffis wrote:
> Christoph Egger wrote:  [Tue Jan 30 2007, 03:23:07AM EST]
>
> > On Tuesday 30 January 2007 02:10, Aron Griffis wrote:
> > > This patch is for the staging tree.  Please apply.
> > >
> > > # HG changeset patch
> > > # User Aron Griffis <aron@xxxxxx>
> > > # Date 1170118368 18000
> > > # Node ID 23560e2248fd267bad6490113ed52d0a27d7e219
> > > # Parent  5e3b47bcc311e7698959f1fa79c4654190593499
> > > Clean up and fix errors in strncpy -> strlcpy conversion
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Aron Griffis <aron@xxxxxx>
> > >
> > > diff -r 5e3b47bcc311 -r 23560e2248fd xen/arch/ia64/xen/dom_fw.c
> > > --- a/xen/arch/ia64/xen/dom_fw.c  Mon Jan 29 22:43:51 2007 +0000
> > > +++ b/xen/arch/ia64/xen/dom_fw.c  Mon Jan 29 19:52:48 2007 -0500
> > > @@ -333,13 +333,13 @@ dom_fw_fake_acpi(struct domain *d, struc
> > >   memset(tables, 0, sizeof(struct fake_acpi_tables));
> > >
> > >   /* setup XSDT (64bit version of RSDT) */
> > > - strlcpy(xsdt->signature, XSDT_SIG, sizeof(xsdt->signature));
> > > + memcpy(xsdt->signature, XSDT_SIG, sizeof(xsdt->signature));
> > >   /* XSDT points to both the FADT and the MADT, so add one entry */
> > >   xsdt->length = sizeof(struct xsdt_descriptor_rev2) + sizeof(u64);
> > >   xsdt->revision = 1;
> > > - strlcpy(xsdt->oem_id, "XEN", sizeof(xsdt->oem_id));
> > > - strlcpy(xsdt->oem_table_id, "Xen/ia64", sizeof(xsdt->oem_table_id));
> > > - strlcpy(xsdt->asl_compiler_id, "XEN", sizeof(xsdt->asl_compiler_id));
> > > + safe_strcpy(xsdt->oem_id, "XEN");
> > > + safe_strcpy(xsdt->oem_table_id, "Xen/ia64");
> > > + safe_strcpy(xsdt->asl_compiler_id, "XEN");
> > >   xsdt->asl_compiler_revision = (xen_major_version() << 16) |
> > >           xen_minor_version();
> >
> > In my patch, safe_strcpy() is gone. And anyway, if safe_strcpy works as
> > expected, then apart from the return value there's no difference to
> > strlcpy().
>
> You're confusing the cleanups with the bugfixes.  Any use of
> safe_strcpy() in my patch was just cleanup.
>
> The bugfixes are on the signature fields (the first change quoted
> above), which I changed to use memcpy since strlcpy adds an unwanted
> NUL.

I am waiting for whatever appears next in the public tree. Then I continue on 
whatever is missing or got broken.




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel