RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][TOOLS] Reducing impact of domain save/restore/dump on Dom0

["Graham, Simon" <Simon.Graham@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Question - why fadvise64 and not posix_fadvise? posix_fadvise complies
> to some posix standard, according to the man page, whereas the
> fadvise64
> seems to be some glibc internal definition.
>

It seemed to me (and I am prepared to be wrong) that posix_fadvise64 is
a Linux only thing and the real official name is fadvise64 (although man
fadvise64 on Linux claims that it's either fadvise64_64 or
sys_fadvise64). Given that Solaris doesn't have fadvise, I'll make this
conditional on being built on linux and use posix_fadvise64 directly.

Simon
 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel