[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] Taken fault at bad CS c000...
>From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx] >Sent: 2007年2月15日 16:14 > >Oh, hmmm, it may be that #GP(0) is a very common reason to exit VM86 >mode. I >expect we print that line every time such an exit happens, and it may not >actually be a bug at all. It may be that logging line is too noisy, even for >debug logging level. > > -- Keir Yeah, I just realized this point just now, since injecting GP for VM86 mode also go through that path. So maybe instead we should avoid that print for vm86_mode at least, or else it's really annoying. But there's still something I didn't understand fully, and maybe you can help here. My basic understanding is that Xen doesn't do much about VM86 mode emulation, and still let monitor in xenlinux to handle that. I captured all cases which causes those prints, and found two classes: 1) Privileged instructions to be handled by xenlinux vm86 monitor, which is normal: - 9c (PUSHF) - 9d (POPF) - cf (IRET) - f4 (HLT) Seems that HLT is also not handled by xenlinux, and not sure whether that will cause any issue. 2) No permission on I/O ports (0xCF8/0xCFC, 0x20e0, 0x20e4) which is weird: Seems that this version of VGA bios will try to scan PCI bus. 0x20e0/0x20e4 is the I/O BAR configured for integrated graphics controller. However I printed all sys_ioperm, and found that Xorg only requests for [0x0-0x3ff],[0x40-0x43],[0x60-0x63]. Then each time when above ports are accessed within VM86 mode, guest_io_okay will fail since related bitmap bits are all 1s. So I'm interested that why X-windows can still work under such case. Do you know any path to enable I/O ports specially for VM86 mode? Thanks, Kevin _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |