[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] xendomains init script

  • To: Florian Kirstein <xenlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen development list <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:51:39 +0000
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 06:51:03 -0800
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcdbR/OJMjH1V8c7EduA9AAX8io7RQ==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] xendomains init script

On 28/2/07 05:20, "Florian Kirstein" <xenlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> ... I've finally build this as patch for current xen-unstable.hg.
> RedHat followed the suggestion to reimplement LSB compatibility in
> RHEL5, but for all the others (including FC6) this patch still is
> needed. It's also referenced as solution in
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171056
> and I'm using it since I first posted it on all my xen builds, don't
> see problems there, should not harm non-redhat dists.

Why is the LSB case moved to after the RedHat case? LSB looks like a more
specific check (it looks for a file with 'lsb' in the path for a start!) so
wouldn't it be better to leave it where it is? Or does that not work?

 -- Keir

Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.