[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/8] 2.6.17 merge additions

  • To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:17:05 +0000
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 03:16:24 -0800
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcdcvE7cjTGOscivEduwRgAX8io7RQ==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/8] 2.6.17 merge additions

On 2/3/07 09:59, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Isn't that patch just doing this -  paging_init() is almost identical to
> native
> after the patch (the sole difference is the setting of
> init_mm.context.pinned).
> The only real addition (to find_early_table_space()) is the space reservation
> for the fixmap tables (so these can be set up earlier) and the stuff moved
> out of paging_init() into init_memory_mapping(). And I don't think it is
> reasonable to expect init_memory_mapping() to get very close to native.

Okay I probably should have done a three-way comparison with the native code
as well, then. My first impression was definitely that the code looked more
complicated rather than less. :-) I'll take another look.

 -- Keir

Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.