[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/10] linux 2.6.18: time handling


  • To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 15:03:22 +0000
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 07:02:40 -0800
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcdfN2qfqVOsBssqEdu3zwAX8io7RQ==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/10] linux 2.6.18: time handling



On 5/3/07 11:17, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Remove struct timer_opts left-overs, add a Xen clocksource, and adjust
> conditionals for x86-64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>

There doesn't seem to be much advantage to this (we're already very diverged
from native i386 time handling) and the disadvantages are a bigger diff
versus what we need for x86/64 (hence more ifdefs) and independent_wallclock
probably stops working.

This is all solvable I'm sure, particularly if clocksources are the way of
the future (e.g., is x86/64 native going to use generic_time any time soon)?

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.