[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] HVM hypercalls, hvm_hypercall_table
For instance we need grant table operations for our PV drivers. Those are not currently supported as HVM-hypercalls. George -----Original Message----- From: Petersson, Mats [mailto:Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 3:39 PM To: George Surka; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] HVM hypercalls, hvm_hypercall_table > -----Original Message----- > From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of George > Surka > Sent: 15 March 2007 19:31 > To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [Xen-devel] HVM hypercalls, hvm_hypercall_table > > Hi everyone, > > I am running XenEnterprise 3.1.0 (Xen v.3.0.3.0) on x86-32 hardware. I > have noticed that the hvm_hypercall_table is initialized for only 6 > hypercalls (memory_op, multicall, xen_version, event_channel_op, > sched_op, and hvm_op). The hypercall_page for HVM domain is > initialized with HVM exit (VMCALL instr.) - all stubs. The purpose of the hvm_hypercall_table is to support para-virtual drivers. You should (generally speaking) not be making other hypercalls from a fully-virtualized (HVM) domain, as those are potentially not safe. Is ther a particular hypercall you're after, or is this a generic question as to why this is? > > So, how do I do the other hypercalls (beyond those 6) from HVM domain? > Do I just have to use INT 0x82 trap without using the hypercall-page > (without using the HYPERVISOR_* hypercall macros in hypercall.h)? No, you can't make any other hypercalls from fully virtualized domains. If you need further hypercalls, it may be possible to add further hypercalls, but I don't believe that a "wholesale" implementation of all hypercalls available to para-virtual Xen will make sense (and in some cases would be potentials for crashing the guest and/or hypervisor), so selective implementation is the key here. [Many of the hypercalls are implemented to overcome the same problems that the hardware solves in fully virtualized domains, so duplicating the solution doesn't actually help anything - just adds more code!] -- Mats > > Why there is just those six hypercalls implemented as HVM-hypercalls? > > Thanks. > > George > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |