[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: Re: struct page field arrangement

To: "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:47:21 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:45:31 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Btw., another question that made me wonder already when doing the
original patch: why is it that x86-64 properly uses locking for mm_pin_all(),
yet i386 doesn't need to?

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: Re: struct page field arrangement
  - From: Keir Fraser

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: Re: struct page field arrangement
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [HVM] Patches to make HVM capable of running OS/2.
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: Re: struct page field arrangement
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: Re: struct page field arrangement
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.