[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] numa=on broken


  • To: Ryan Harper <ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:17:30 +0100
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:17:44 +0100
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Acdy962y7B7hRN7qEdusYQAWy6hiGQ==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] numa=on broken



On 30/3/07 19:08, "Ryan Harper" <ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> So -- can we ensure that the node that owns low memory is node zero?
> 
> AFAIK, that is the case, look at the SRAT table:
> 
> (XEN) SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 0-a0000
> (XEN) SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 0-e0000000
> (XEN) SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 100000000-200000000

What if you move end_boot_allocator() to just before 'early_boot = 0' in
arch/x86/setup.c?

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.