Re: [Xen-devel] numa=on broken

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 30/3/07 19:46, "Ryan Harper" <ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> That is, we are still dying in init_heap_pages(), but this time for
> allocating avail[0] rather than avail[1].

In addition to that change in x86/setup.c, move the first three lines of
code from end_boot_allocator() into init_xenheap_pages() (these are the ones
that actually set up the statically allocated node0 metadata). If that works
I'll sort out a clean fix.

This is just a simple exercise in code shuffling. :-)

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel