Re: [Xen-devel] hap_domctl

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 24/4/07 00:59, "John Levon" <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 494 int hap_domctl(struct domain *d, xen_domctl_shadow_op_t *sc,
> 495                XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(void) u_domctl)
> 513     case XEN_DOMCTL_SHADOW_OP_ENABLE:
> 514         HAP_ERROR("Bad hap domctl op %u\n", sc->op);
> 515         domain_crash(d);
> 516         return -EINVAL;
> 
> Line 515 looks very peculiar to me. Why are we punishing a domU for a
> mistake in dom0?

Looks pretty stupid. But harmless.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel