[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] [ACM] Code restructuring
- To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:33:20 +0100
- Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:30:32 -0700
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
- Thread-index: AceGr8vNCqcAlvKjEduiCgAWy6hiGQ==
- Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] [ACM] Code restructuring
On 24/4/07 17:15, "Stefan Berger" <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Much nicer, thank you. I've applied it for 3.0.5. However, given the effort
> put in to labelling a domain at the very start of its lifetime, wouldn't it
> be a good idea to leave that label attached until the domain is actually
> destroyed? This would correspond to putting the destructor call in
> domain_destroy() or, even better, complete_domain_destroy(). Bear in mind
> that a domain may still be accessible and have resources allocated to it
> even after domain_kill() finishes executing. So stripping its resource label
> at that point in time is a bit worrying.
Right. Can you move this one call into complete_domain_destroy()?
Will do.
K.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
