Re: [Xen-devel][Xense-devel][PATCH][3/4] Xen Security Modules: tools

["George S. Coker, II" <george.coker@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'll reformat the patches.

On 5/8/07, Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > There are two styles we properly support: Xen style as in files like
> > event_channel.c, xmalloc.c, etc.; and Linux style (generally seen in files
> > ripped off fairly directly from Linux -- *not* used in new files). The
> > halfway-house files usually arise from me having been too lazy to enforce
> > Xen style when they were checked in, and generally being in bits of the
> > tree where I don't often venture.
>
> I did wonder if it was something like that ;-)
>
> > Seeing as we're planning to be more strict from now on, the current ACM
> > code style is *not* to be followed.
>
> Cool, thanks for the clarification.  I'll continue running the verifier over
> new patches and I can submit it for inclusion in 3.0.6 - once I've finished
> teaching it the difference between Xen and Linux.  Then folks will be able to
> run it over submitted code as a sanity test.
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
> --
> Dave: Just a question. What use is a unicyle with no seat?  And no pedals!
> Mark: To answer a question with a question: What use is a skateboard?
> Dave: Skateboards have wheels.
> Mark: My wheel has a wheel!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel