[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] svm: save_svm_cpu_user_regs vs. svm_store_cpu_guest_regs

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 09:25:32 +0200
Delivery-date: Wed, 09 May 2007 00:23:17 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

What is the reason for save_svm_cpu_user_regs() explicitly saving rax?
Without this, the function could be eliminated, with its single use replaced by
a call to svm_store_cpu_guest_regs().

Thanks, Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] svm: save_svm_cpu_user_regs vs. svm_store_cpu_guest_regs
  - From: Keir Fraser

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Is patches/linux-2.6.18/xen-hotplug.patch still necessary?
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RFC] consider weight for vcpu-pin case
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] svm: save_svm_cpu_user_regs vs. svm_store_cpu_guest_regs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.