[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/3] virtio infrastructure
Santos, Jose Renato G wrote: > It seems that we will still need specific devices drivers > for each different virtualization flavor. For example, > we will still need to have a specific Xen netfront > device that talks to a backend device in dom0, using > page grants, and other Xen specific mechanisms. > It looks like will still need to maintain all the virtual device > drivers and in addition we will now have to maintain > another virtualization layer. > The hope is that the Xen-specific elements of the driver will be restricted to Xen-specific things like grant tables, and the bulk of the driver and its logic can be common. Whether that can be achieved and still retain the full performance/features of the entirely Xen-specific netfront driver remains to be seen. I haven't had a chance to look at doing any Xen-virtio glue yet, so I'm not really sure how it will work out. J _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |