[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] A useless short jmp?


  • To: "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:03:42 +0800
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:02:13 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcexsWxtRnqse1ngRRSVOXIcWSiSzwADXzoNABVnA0A=
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] A useless short jmp?

>> According to Intel Spec, it's useless, do we have any 
>special reason to
>> have it there?
>> BTW why put mov $1, %bl between lmsw and it's corresponding ljmp?
>
>Hmmm... I'm sure I read somewhere about a jmp to clear the 
>prefetch queue,


Surely you did read it :-), in the latest Spec (version of May 2007),
in17.29.3 Enabling and Disabling Paging, it's said a near jump should be
executed after set or clear PG flag in CR0, but it's a different case
since we are setting or clearing PE flag, probably plus PG changes too.

-Xin 

>but reading the appropriate manual pages now I see I only need 
>the ljmp.
>I'll fix that and also move the write to %bx somewhere more sensible.
>
> Thanks,
> Keir
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.