[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][Retry 1] 4/4: cpufreq/PowerNow! in Xen: PowerNow! changes


  • To: "Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 12:07:48 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 04:04:05 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Acfr5NmmGClNJFfYEdySawAX8io7RQAMFBbgABzKnZ0=
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][Retry 1] 4/4: cpufreq/PowerNow! in Xen: PowerNow! changes

On 31/8/07 22:24, "Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Should we have a copy of that file in powernow-k8-xen.c? Can
>> the patched file work correctly in a native Linux build?
> 
> If I need to change one function in
> driver/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c (to use Rik's new getidletime
> platform hypercall), do I need to make an entire new file or
> can I just add it inline?

Not if you do not break the file for native builds.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.