Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [VTD-NEO][patch 6/6] Intel VT-d/Neocleus 1:1 mreged code for PCI passthrough

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 20/9/07 09:35, "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> dom0.patch: create vt-d 1:1 mapping for dom0; call iommu_domain_init()
>> in domain.c.
> 
> Do PV guests actually need per-domain iommu state? If they do, isn't
> release_devices() the partnering destructor function, and so should that not
> be invoked from domain.c too?

I checked in everything except the extra invocation of iommu_domain_init().
I want to understand what iommu_domain_init() and release_devices() do
before deciding whether to move their invocations.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel