[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: cache current vcpu
>>> Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 29.10.07 18:23 >>> >Gcc is quite capable of eliminating common subexpressions involving >current(), ... I have to partly disagree here: While gcc is capable of doing this, it cannot do anything about uses of current that have function calls in between, and I also don't think making get_current() an __attribute__((__pure__)) inline function would be correct. I do agree that in certain places using current is more readable, albeit I think that there are quite a few places where it is already non-obvious that 'v' denotes 'current' (perhaps naming might just help here - if 'v' only ever gets set from 'current' in a function, renaming it to 'cur' might be reasonable to consider). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |