[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [QEMU-DM] Upgrade emulated UART to 16550A.
- To: "Alan Cox" <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: "Trolle Selander" <trolle.selander@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 19:06:59 +0100
- Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 10:07:37 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=oIYJLmx6+i5Qn5AJg0Tuy2xUqFvCNIHVfnwwP5NQyhPQZNWJK3b3BSIFiNrXVSbKEk0zECpd+FP92IElvCEp2fzN2y6Fpen0zN++Cf4cDGdZPn/Ob4ni7ZqaHfHU4mqdBgF8GNsMP4bb/OG+z8+4AHn17SPBPls+A6lxYG61H2U=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Yes, I do mean 16550A-or-later. The code comments make this clear even if my patch name and slightly rushed patched description didn't. The hardware document I used was actually for a 16550D, but I believe there's no difference on the programming/behavior level.
On Dec 4, 2007 5:48 PM, Alan Cox < alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:32:39 +0100 "Trolle Selander" < trolle.selander@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This patch adds 16550 emulation to qemu-dm. I still consider it a work in
withdrawn. The 16550A is subtly different.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
