[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] writable pagetables scalability issue


  • To: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:17:03 +0000
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:19:11 -0800
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Acg4/V2zm/1TkKTwEdy7ewAX8io7RQ==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] writable pagetables scalability issue

On 7/12/07 17:53, "Rik van Riel" <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> I think we can probably just as easily strip out the big lock entirely from
>> the critical paths. It's not really needed much these days.
> 
> "not needed much" makes me kind of nervous :)
> 
> Exactly what do we still need to protect against?

The main thing right now is update_va_mapping() goes at the linear map, and
has to avoid races where a pte is being deconstructed but has not yet been
flushed from the linear map. If we change the implementation of
update_va_mapping() then I think the biglock can fall away.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.