RE: [Xen-devel] [FW: FYI: The plan for Xen kernels in Fedora 9]

["Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>]

>From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
>Sent: 2007年12月11日 8:37
>
>Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
>> I just tidied up my current tree, and I've pushed patches to 
>>
>>      http://people.redhat.com/sct/patches/dom0-pvops/2.6.24-rc4-A0/
>>
>> These include Jeremy Fitzhardinge's existing dom0 work 
>(except for the
>> chunk that was a start towards adding the ELF note stuff to vmlinux,
>> I'll add that back once it's at least compiling properly.)
>>
>> So far everything is done within the pvops framework, so 
>there's nothing
>> added that stops a single kernel image running both baremetal and as
>> dom0.  New since Jeremy's patches are a basic mtrr plugin (not full
>> runtime mtrr, but enough to satisfy SMP boot), a bit of ACPI tweaking
>> and ioremap pv_ops.
>
>I just had a quick look through this, and it looks good to me.  One
>thing though: I'm wondering if we shouldn't have 
>CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 protect
>this stuff, so that its possible to build a domU-only kernel.
>
>    J

Or take a neutral one like CONFIG_XEN_PRIV?

Thanks,
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel