[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Re: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support

  • To: <ncmike@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:50:18 +0000
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 06:30:22 -0800
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Acg+WELegYh2pqpLEdyFxwAX8io7RQ==
  • Thread-topic: Scheduling groups, credit scheduler support

On 14/12/07 13:35, "Mike D. Day" <ncmike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Not slowing down microbenchmarks is the least we should expect for
>> acceptance. The feature needs to earn its keep in the tree by demonstrating
>> superior performance or scalability in a situation we care about. Like for
>> HVM stub domains. :-)
> Yes of course. But it also must not slow normal scheduling, which is
> the point of these benchmarks. As soon as the stub domain is ready for
> testing I'll start performance work on hvm domains.

Sounds good!


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.