Re: [Xen-devel] 3.1.x and 3.2.x releases

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I only did a straightforward port of the xend parts, without much testing.
You could add tracing to the hvm_param hypercall in xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c,
and see whether the timer mode is being set for your HVM guest that way.

 -- Keir

On 26/12/07 19:53, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thanks Keir... but in trying to test this, I find that timer_mode seems to be
> displayed in sxp debug output in xend.log for xen-unstable, but I don't see
> sxp output for timer_mode in xend.log for xen-3.1-testing (cset 15564).  Does
> timer_mode get properly set and passed down to xen in xen-3.1-testing simply
> by adding a (e.g.) "timer_mode=3" line in the config file?  If so, is there
> another way I can verify that?
> 
> Thanks,
> Dan
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Keir Fraser
>> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 3:26 AM
>> To: dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx; xen-devel
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 3.1.x and 3.2.x releases
>> 
>> 
>> Done.
>> 
>>  K.
>> 
>> 
>> On 19/12/07 17:22, "Dan Magenheimer"
>> <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> Any chance the sequence of timer/tick fixes that you, Dave Winchell,
>>> Ben Guthro, Haitao Shan, and Eddie Dong were discussing/developing
>>> over the last two months could get into 3.1.3?  Clocks that
>> gain time
>>> can cause some pretty nasty difficult-to-diagnose real customer
>>> problems.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dan
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
>> Keir Fraser
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 9:01 AM
>>>> To: xen-devel
>>>> Subject: [Xen-devel] 3.1.x and 3.2.x releases
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Folks,
>>>> 
>>>> A new release candidate for 3.2.0 has just been checked into the
>>>> xen-unstable tree. It's available from staging and will be in
>>>> the main tree
>>>> when it has passed internal regression tests.
>>>> 
>>>> Meanwhile, in preparation for 3.1.3, please let me know if
>>>> there are any
>>>> further patches from xen-unstable that should be backported
>>>> into the 3.1
>>>> branch. You can pull the xen-3.1-testing.hg repository to
>> see what has
>>>> already been backported.
>>>> 
>>>>  Thanks,
>>>>  Keir
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel