[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] 3.1.x and 3.2.x releases
On 28/12/07 15:47, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 01:16:50PM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote: >> Oh, it's because your stdint.h type definitions are macros rather than >> typedefs. I believe the C spec requires them to be typedef names (Section >> 7.18 of the C99 draft spec). It looks like the problem stems from the >> stdint.h supplied with gnulib, included in libvirt-0.4.0. Why does libvirt >> require its own stdint.h? > > The gnulib stuff is for portability. The stdint.h in the gnulib/ directory > of libvirt will only be used on OS where there is no stdint.h present in > the regular /usr/include. > > Can someone tell me what OS / platform the libvirt compile errors were > occurring on. stdint.h is a pretty common thing so I'd only expect it > to be have been used when building libvirt on Windows, certainly not when > on Linux. Well, I hopefully fixed it now anyway, both in 3.1-testing and unstable. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |