[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] .xend.domains vs xend.domains_with_state

  • To: xendevel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: jd <jdsw2002@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:36:26 -0800 (PST)
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:37:06 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=cQzA1B6OD4JVqqkaspMfGCo7pHwY/2EXCRXb5jMma4ApocYydaBG0pLiLr16dTVCUHxO6eTLvA5dSTPY9+VBbbNN7VMHRqwosj94o81nPtcsXZNyS62ViEHk8O4k7VvYMWlxnfKkTVSk4NT4b7WFbm2FZgxAveLAR+JIZr7nXHs=;
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

   CentOS 5.1 is showing xen 3.1 (in xm info) and but
does not have xend.domains_with_State. 

   While SLES 10 SP1 is showing Xen 3.0.4 (in xm info)
but it has the domains_with_state xml-rpc call.

The xend.domains does not return paused VMs. as it
used to earlier. This means if the
xend.domains_with_state is available, it needs to be
used (with 'all' parameter).

  How can I determine if the code should use first api
or second. (without making an RPC and checking for


Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  

Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.