Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] respin of mprotect performance patch

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bruce,

Attached is my equivalent implementation of ATOMIC_PT_UPDATE. Notice that I
changed the name to MMU_PT_UPDATE_PRESERVE_AD, also that I removed a bunch
of code duplication albeit at the expense of passing yet another parameter
around.

Could you rev your Linux patch and give it a spin?

 Thanks,
 Keir

On 8/1/08 01:05, "Bruce Rogers" <brogers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I've incorporated the comments of Jan and Keir into the attached patches, with
> the exception of moving mmu_ops related entries from public/xen.h into
> architecture specific headers.
> Thanks for your review.  Let me know if I've missed anything.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Rogers <brogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> - Bruce
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Attachment: 00-preserve-ad.patch
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel