[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] A question no one can answer


  • To: "Robert Stober" <rstober@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: weiming <zephyr.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:01:30 -0500
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:01:53 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=rxGkl2HlL4JeXBuwYgE1kkwX1shkeNHBMDk5fCtQU0YF7ybGZbkgkXvtJZe/FDtMfkSbmLg13jpZZKWYKM+jshVGglw4Djwqy6Ai25a41P/IkQJEhO/VN5G5gQWWsoWMA/sQDUUiBM6rsa1AuSMjlJCKQnIT9AkrMwUaLMGS82Y=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

You mean QoS on memory bandwidth? It's an interesting question. (there are similar problems like QoS on shared L2)

I think it's hard to do.  Even for a native OS, it may only control this indirectly by adjusting the CPU time slice. And I don't think any commercial OS has implemented such feature yet.

Weiming

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Robert Stober <rstober@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Good Afternoon,

Is it possible to limit a guest OS to a specific memory bandwidth
allocation? The purpose is to stop one guest OS from saturating the
memory bus.

Thank you,

Robert

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.