[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] about bind_pirq


  • To: 余上 <yusunn@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:44:47 +0000
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:43:58 -0800
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Ach4U9dPFgt+nORHEdyYHAAWy6hiGQ==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] about bind_pirq

Yes, there is a default binding semantics for binding an event channel,
which has to be overridden with bind_vcpu if you want a different binding.

 -- Keir

On 26/2/08 08:13, "余上" <yusunn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi All,
> I find this hypercall lacks a convenient parameter to set the binding
> vcpu , so , it seems there need another call to bind_vcpu . Is this
> the intended functionality ?
> 
> Best regards
> yushang
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.