[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] Release 0.9.1 of GPL PV Drivers for Windows
- To: "Tomasz Chmielewski" <mangoo@xxxxxxxx>
- From: "Emre ERENOGLU" <erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 17:39:42 +0200
- Cc: James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 23 May 2008 08:40:58 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=G9y9GRg82+lgxfPBDUlTRiZaU2MEhPGRk5DaS1Fo56U011EqkMXzGKtrikwmk869ZBV6rDas2Fe1qD0RgNOiUjx29FcXENpBGQP/AKB+p82tZhFu48BlhLKe4XZpzgk82oQWtSg5cuORAZuRARTpDZVyj//3hK6MudHWPGMJfrA=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
Hi,
If you look at my posts in the last months, I've conducted a test for network and disk drivers on a Linux HVM running with unmodified_drivers (PV Drivers for Linux).
The result was that Linux HVM with PV drivers performed nearly at the same speed as the Dom0. thus we can say that Windows PV drivers have still some gap to close, but let's try to do a new test with James' latest drivers.
Emre
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski < mangoo@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
James Harper schrieb:
I have just uploaded a new binary release of the PV drivers for Windows.
I have tested that XenNet and XenSCSI can unload successfully (eg
upgrade without reboot), but only once this version or newer is
installed.
Does anyone have performance numbers for Windows running on these drivers?
An objective and meaningful (hardware independent, more or less) comparison would be Linux PV guest vs Windows with PV drivers; both network and hard disk throughput.
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
--
Emre Erenoglu
erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
