[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support
Ingo Molnar wrote: this problem still reproduces.i've pushed out all fixes into tip/x86/xen-64bit. That branch combined with the config above still reproduces the build failure above. Subject: x86_64: fix non-paravirt compilation Make sure SWAPGS and PARAVIRT_ADJUST_EXCEPTION_FRAME are properly defined when CONFIG_PARAVIRT is off. Fixes Ingo's build failure: arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S: Assembler messages: arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:1201: Error: invalid character '_' in mnemonic arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:1205: Error: invalid character '_' in mnemonic arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:1209: Error: invalid character '_' in mnemonic arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:1213: Error: invalid character '_' in mnemonic Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx> --- include/asm-x86/irqflags.h | 22 +++++++++++++--------- include/asm-x86/processor.h | 3 --- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) =================================================================== --- a/include/asm-x86/irqflags.h +++ b/include/asm-x86/irqflags.h @@ -167,7 +167,20 @@ #define INTERRUPT_RETURN_NMI_SAFE NATIVE_INTERRUPT_RETURN_NMI_SAFE #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 +#define SWAPGS swapgs +/* + * Currently paravirt can't handle swapgs nicely when we + * don't have a stack we can rely on (such as a user space + * stack). So we either find a way around these or just fault + * and emulate if a guest tries to call swapgs directly. + * + * Either way, this is a good way to document that we don't + * have a reliable stack. x86_64 only. + */ #define SWAPGS_UNSAFE_STACK swapgs + +#define PARAVIRT_ADJUST_EXCEPTION_FRAME /* */ + #define INTERRUPT_RETURN iretq #define USERGS_SYSRET64 \ swapgs; \ @@ -233,15 +246,6 @@ #else #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 -/* - * Currently paravirt can't handle swapgs nicely when we - * don't have a stack we can rely on (such as a user space - * stack). So we either find a way around these or just fault - * and emulate if a guest tries to call swapgs directly. - * - * Either way, this is a good way to document that we don't - * have a reliable stack. x86_64 only. - */ #define ARCH_LOCKDEP_SYS_EXIT call lockdep_sys_exit_thunk #define ARCH_LOCKDEP_SYS_EXIT_IRQ \ TRACE_IRQS_ON; \ =================================================================== --- a/include/asm-x86/processor.h +++ b/include/asm-x86/processor.h @@ -541,9 +541,6 @@ } #define set_iopl_mask native_set_iopl_mask -#define SWAPGS swapgs - -#define PARAVIRT_ADJUST_EXCEPTION_FRAME /* */ #endif /* CONFIG_PARAVIRT */ /* _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |