[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] qemu-xen: Fix PV segfault
Ian Jackson schreef: John Levon writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] qemu-xen: Fix PV segfault"):On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 10:38:32AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:While I'm at it: There is a patch queue with at http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/patches/ The plan is to submit that stuff upstream, so regular qemu will have xen support. Right now the patch queue has only paravirt bits. It comesI'm confused, I thought that was the point of the qemu-xen treeGerd Hoffman's tree seems to be something entirely different. I'm not sure I understand what the point of it is. The reason why everyone is using qemu is that it has all of the hardware emulation device models. Qemu proper (ie upstream) also uses the CPU emulator (translator, now). KVM and Xen don't use that because they run the code on the physical CPU one way or another. Gerd Hoffman's setup doesn't use the device models, nor the CPU emulator. Really as far as I can tell the only thing he wants from qemu is the command line parser ! This is quite bizarre as it's not a very good command line parser (qemu upstream are considering replacing it with something more data-driven and more modular). I think the primary idea is to get away from xend, and qemu gets the job done. Stefan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |