[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][XEN] PV blk backend: Make 32bit PV guests work on 64bit PV Dom0
On 28/7/08 14:00, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Quite the opposite. By doing it in your own header files you can specify >>> the structure names and so on exactly how you would like them to be for the >>> particular OS concerned. >> >> I'm concerned about having/keeping the API/ABI the same between all OS's and >> not about their implementation. > > The interfaces (both the API exposed by public/ headers; and the ABI they > describe) won't change. At least not in a way that isn't backward > compatible. Or we'd be breaking old OSes all the time! I might add: why would placing those extra struct definitions in the public headers make it any more or less likely that we'll break compatibility in future? That makes no sense to me. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |