[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] State of Xen in upstream Linux

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Andy Burns <lists.xensource.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:27:26 +0100
Delivery-date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:27:52 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On 31/07/2008 01:51, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

what's new with Xen.


Thanks for the write-up (and the work itself!)

What's missing? What do you depend on?

I realise pv_ops dom0 should come first to save users' pain in thatdept, currently I use pciback/front on 2.6.18 kernels, any idea whenthis might re-appear either in domU or dom0 pv_ops kernels?




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] State of Xen in upstream Linux
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] IPF-Xen3.3-RC1 testing is blocked by a compiling issue of remote-qemu
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Working around xenstored performance?
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] State of Xen in upstream Linux
Next by thread: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] State of Xen in upstream Linux
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.