Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu

[Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Gerd Hoffmann, le Wed 06 Aug 2008 16:08:47 +0200, a écrit :
>> Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Gerd Hoffmann, le Wed 06 Aug 2008 15:54:33 +0200, a écrit :
>>>> IMHO the best way to address this issue is to rebase frequently.
>>> Then why not pushing the changes to xen repositories in the first place?
>> Because I want have xen support in *upstream* qemu.
> 
> I know, but you are basically saying "ok, guys, you'll just manage the
> breakage of the big merge, thanks", that's not very convenient, to say
> the least.  For instance, where should fix patches be sent to?  Both
> qemu-devel and xen-devel?  Just xen-devel and thus make Ian have to push
> them to qemu-devel?

Most of the patches probably to both qemu-devel and xen-devel.  Stuff
unrelated to xen (say e1000 emulation bugs) qemu-devel only.

> Pushing the cleaning changes to Xen first can be done and would entail
> much easier to tackle breakage, and the merge back from qemu would then
> be trivial, why not doing so?
> 
>>>> I'm trying to fiddle my bits into qemu-dm right now.  One problem is
>>>> that I get build failures simply because of the fact that the qemu-dm
>>>> base is old compared to upstream qemu.
>>> Use Ian Jackson's tree!
>> Adapt my patches to an oldish qemu fork, so they must be adapted again
>> for submitting upstream?  No, thank you.
> 
> AGAIN, THERE IS THE IAN JACKSON TREE.
>
> Thanks for reading.

I get build failures when patching THE IAN JACKSON TREE due to THE IAN
JACKSON TREE lagging behind upstream.

I can read, thank you.  Please stop crying.

> Ian has _already_ done that hard work.

Oh, rebasing isn't a one-shot thing.  You have to do it over and over
again.  Unless you get your code upstream of course.

cheers,
  Gerd

-- 
http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenner/

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel