[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xenner: add event channel implementation.
On 26/8/08 09:27, "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Afaics there's some workflow or patchflow to >> be worked out here: > > Workflow could look like this: > > (1) Ian merges upstream into qemu-xen. > (2) I'll rebase my patches to the resulting tree. > (3) Merge both patchsets, into the trees. > > That should result in almost identical hw/xen* files in both trees, so > we don't end up with a big mess when Ian merges again. That sounds like a plausible avenue. I don't want to speak for Ian though: he'll be the one doing most of the work on the qemu-xen side. >> I can't see why we would take Gerd's patches wholesale >> when we have a working patchset already. > > Which patchset you are refering to? As far I know Ian & Samuel are > focusing on getting the changes to generic qemu code upstream (such as > serial and ide fixes which ran over the qemu-devel list already), not on > the xen support bits. Sorry, by patchset I meant qemu-xen. Bad confusing terminology on my part. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |