Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/13] Handle terminating signals.

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Avi Kivity writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/13] Handle 
terminating signals."):
> Not sure that it matters, but the semantics are slightly different:  
> with a thread you don't get EINTR in random syscalls as the signal 
> thread is the only one that has the signals unblocked.

That's true but I don't think it's really relevant because we already
have other signal handlers (and we might grow further ones) so the
rest of the code has to be robust against those.

My experience suggests very strongly that we should avoid doing
multithreaded things if at all possible.  Threads are less portable;
even when they are provided many of the implementations are buggy
(although less so nowadays).

There is also the way that once you have a multithreaded program, it
is much more difficult to discourage the expansion of the concurrent
functionality until the whole program is a mass of race bugs.  I would
rather not open this stable door.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel