[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Poor performance on HVM (kernbench)

To: "Daniel Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Todd Deshane" <deshantm@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:48:15 -0400
Cc: xen-devel mailing list <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:48:38 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:references; b=QZflA8Z6Xm+m6MnfyHlaPtwWR7iDHGy+t6tlPH0Tkexep48wxNVX0fQ0H+tjLI1M1S 13Mz73NbjX/dGr9bnDwGktECXs1cPgSJReO0zJneka97JmyPbXol08Cn9pjVOFldFxy0 IEq9SSao40Tnebwlwa3ogTam3CoJ8GwzYuSLk=
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Daniel Magenheimer
<dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Perhaps you should run the native with nosmp then, to ensure
> the comparison isn't taken out of context.
>

Dom0, nosmp

Average Optimal load -j 4 Run (std deviation):
Elapsed Time 428.058 (0.18431)
User Time 371.648 (0.86358)
System Time 56.346 (0.989181)
Percent CPU 99 (0)
Context Switches 29144.6 (52.3479)
Sleeps 36239.8 (441.198)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] Poor performance on HVM (kernbench)
  - From: Todd Deshane
- RE: [Xen-devel] Poor performance on HVM (kernbench)
  - From: Daniel Magenheimer

Prev by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Update vtd.txt
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Poor performance on HVM (kernbench)
Previous by thread: RE: [Xen-devel] Poor performance on HVM (kernbench)
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Poor performance on HVM (kernbench)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.