[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Problems with enabling hypervisor C and P-state control
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>From: Yu, Ke >>Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 11:15 AM >>> >>> >>> Second, when I look at the P-state output (shown below), xenpm shows >>> that the lowest P-state is only set on the first socket (this is a >>> quad-core, quad-socket system). However, I have a feeling that this >>> might be a problem with displaying the data rather than the >>underlying >>> logic. Any ideas? >>> >>> # xenpm | grep '*' >>> *P3 : freq [1599 MHz] >>> *P3 : freq [1599 MHz] >>> *P3 : freq [1599 MHz] >>> *P3 : freq [1599 MHz] >>> *P0 : freq [2398 MHz] >>> *P0 : freq [2398 MHz] >>> *P0 : freq [2398 MHz] >>> *P0 : freq [2398 MHz] >>> *P0 : freq [2398 MHz] >>> *P0 : freq [2398 MHz] >>> *P0 : freq [2398 MHz] >>> *P0 : freq [2398 MHz] >>> *P0 : freq [2398 MHz] >>> *P0 : freq [2398 MHz] >>> *P0 : freq [2398 MHz] >>> *P0 : freq [2398 MHz] >> >>This seems a bug. From the above info, I can not decided if it >>is xenpm issue or xen cpufreq issue. could you please provide >>more info, e.g. >>- xen boot log (with loglvl=info), so that we can see if >>cpufreq driver is initialized in all cpus >>- xentrace date on Px state, so that we can see if the Px >>transition really happened. >> > > BTW, did you create any domains and run any workloads? No, not yet. Only dom0 was active. Running workloads in different domains is the next step once I have verified that basic Px transitions are performing as expected. Cheers, Niraj -- Niraj Tolia, Researcher, HP Labs http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Niraj_Tolia/ _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |