Re: Re: [Xen-devel] mini-os: a event channel experiment

["Paul Samon" <paul.samon@xxxxxxxxx>]

Great.  -- Paul S.

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Y. D. <duyuyang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It worked. I totally forgot that.
Thank you very much.

shawn
------------------
Y. D.
2008-10-29

-------------------------------------------------------------
From：Paul Samon
Date：2008-10-29 10:12:43
To：Y. D.
Cc：xen-devel
Subject：Re: [Xen-devel] mini-os: a event channel experiment

I think you need an "EVTCHNOP_unmask" invocation for the port in domain A.

-- Paul S.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Y. D. <duyuyang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Hi all,
>
> In a mini-os domain A, I start a thread allocating an event channel:
> err = evtchn_alloc_unbound(remote_domid, experiment_handler, NULL, &port);
> and registered a handler. The err value is 0. The thread normally exits.
>
> While in another mini-os domain B, I start a thread binding that event
> channel:
> err = evtchn_bind_interdomain(remote_domid, remote_port, experiment_handler2, NULL, &port);
>
> and send a event:
> err = HYPERVISOR_event_channel_op(EVTCHNOP_send, &event);  Both err is 0.
> The thread normally exits.
>
> but in the domain A, the event handler is not called.
>
> What is wrong with it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> shawn
>
>
> 2008-10-29
> ------------------------------
> Y. D.
>

> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel