[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 25 of 38] xen mtrr: Add mtrr_ops support for Xen mtrr
Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 11:10 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/xen.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/xen.c new file mode 100644 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/xen.c @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@...+ +/* DOM0 TODO: Need to fill in the remaining mtrr methods to have full + * working userland mtrr support. */ +static struct mtrr_ops xen_mtrr_ops = { + .vendor = X86_VENDOR_UNKNOWN, +// .set = xen_set_mtrr, +// .get = xen_get_mtrr, + .get_free_region = generic_get_free_region, +// .validate_add_page = xen_validate_add_page, + .have_wrcomb = positive_have_wrcomb, + .use_intel_if = 0, + .num_var_ranges = xen_num_var_ranges, +};... I'm vague on the details now, but looking back at the dom0 patch set here: http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=linux-2.6-dom0-pvops.git;a=shortlog;h=55abc194080b5cf31cd66f5e35e8e5c5af2aa927 I see we did have a bunch more mtrr work e.g. fixing the TODO above: http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=linux-2.6-dom0-pvops.git;a=commitdiff;h=93f779bf3d79f28d0933bfbc53f7b8c5b6496081 Yes, the mtrr changes are incomplete. I started on them as much as necessary to get things booting, and then left the rest to revisit. It's not a particularly pretty part of the kernel, and so I was hoping some magic beautification fairy would visit it before I needed to touch it more... J _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |